CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE vs STADIUM BRATS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE: 4
vs
STADIUM BRATS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE | STADIUM BRATS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 487 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 18.4 g | 13.6 g | |
| Carbs | 7.9 g | 4.6 g | |
| Fat | 42.1 g | 30.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE | STADIUM BRATS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE | STADIUM BRATS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,316 MG | 773 MG |