CHILEAN SEABASS vs FULLY COOKED FROZEN CLAMS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FULLY COOKED FROZEN CLAMS wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHILEAN SEABASS: 0
vs
FULLY COOKED FROZEN CLAMS: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHILEAN SEABASS | FULLY COOKED FROZEN CLAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 200 cal | 118 cal | |
| Protein | 15.3 g | 25.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 14.7 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHILEAN SEABASS | FULLY COOKED FROZEN CLAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHILEAN SEABASS | FULLY COOKED FROZEN CLAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 6 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 4.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 94 MG | 112 MG |