CHICKEN TENDERS vs Pork Back Rib 2.25 down
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN TENDERS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN TENDERS: 5
vs
Pork Back Rib 2.25 down: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN TENDERS | Pork Back Rib 2.25 down | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 116 cal | 268 cal | |
| Protein | 22.3 g | 17.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 22.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN TENDERS | Pork Back Rib 2.25 down | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN TENDERS | Pork Back Rib 2.25 down | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 5 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 330 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 45 MG | 62 MG |