CHICKEN MARSALA vs UNCURED BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN MARSALA wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN MARSALA: 5
vs
UNCURED BEEF FRANKS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN MARSALA | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 121 cal | 340 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 11.3 g | |
| Carbs | 4.3 g | 7.6 g | |
| Fat | 5 g | 28.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN MARSALA | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN MARSALA | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 44 MG | 434 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 271 MG | 962 MG |