CHICKEN MARSALA vs HATFIELD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN MARSALA: 4
vs
HATFIELD: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN MARSALA | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 121 cal | 286 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 4.3 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 5 g | 26.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN MARSALA | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN MARSALA | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 6 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 44 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 271 MG | 946 MG |