CHICKEN FRANKS vs ORGANIC KALE BALSAMIC
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORGANIC KALE BALSAMIC wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FRANKS: 2
vs
ORGANIC KALE BALSAMIC: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FRANKS | ORGANIC KALE BALSAMIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 209 cal | 132 cal | |
| Protein | 16.3 g | 19.1 g | |
| Carbs | 2.3 g | 2.9 g | |
| Fat | 14.0 g | 3.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FRANKS | ORGANIC KALE BALSAMIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.8 MG | 7.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FRANKS | ORGANIC KALE BALSAMIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 29 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,163 MG | 603 MG |