CHICKEN FRANKS vs BUN LENGTH FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FRANKS: 6
vs
BUN LENGTH FRANKS: 1
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FRANKS | BUN LENGTH FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 209 cal | 326 cal | |
| Protein | 14.0 g | 9.3 g | |
| Carbs | 7.0 g | 11.6 g | |
| Fat | 11.6 g | 25.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FRANKS | BUN LENGTH FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 41.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FRANKS | BUN LENGTH FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 140 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 907 MG | 1,209 MG |