CHICKEN FRANKS vs UNCURED POLISH KIELBASA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FRANKS: 6
vs
UNCURED POLISH KIELBASA: 1
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FRANKS | UNCURED POLISH KIELBASA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 209 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 16.4 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 3.0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 13.4 g | 26.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FRANKS | UNCURED POLISH KIELBASA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.8 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FRANKS | UNCURED POLISH KIELBASA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,164 MG | 911 MG |