CHICKEN FRANKS vs BANGERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FRANKS: 6
vs
BANGERS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FRANKS | BANGERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 208 cal | 224 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 15.8 g | |
| Carbs | 6.3 g | 6.6 g | |
| Fat | 10.4 g | 14.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FRANKS | BANGERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 43.8 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FRANKS | BANGERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 125 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 958 MG | 750 MG |