CHICKEN FRANKS vs BUNFULL HOT DOGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FRANKS: 5
vs
BUNFULL HOT DOGS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FRANKS | BUNFULL HOT DOGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 238 cal | 298 cal | |
| Protein | 11.9 g | 7.0 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 5.3 g | |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 28.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FRANKS | BUNFULL HOT DOGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FRANKS | BUNFULL HOT DOGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 143 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.7 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,071 MG | 1,158 MG |