CHICKEN FRANKS vs LOWER SODIUM PORK & BEEF BOLOGNA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FRANKS: 8
vs
LOWER SODIUM PORK & BEEF BOLOGNA: 0
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FRANKS | LOWER SODIUM PORK & BEEF BOLOGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 190 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 11.9 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FRANKS | LOWER SODIUM PORK & BEEF BOLOGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FRANKS | LOWER SODIUM PORK & BEEF BOLOGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 48 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.7 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 333 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 833 MG | 643 MG |