CHICKEN FRANKS vs NATURAL CASING BEEF & PORK FRANKFURTERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FRANKS: 5
vs
NATURAL CASING BEEF & PORK FRANKFURTERS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FRANKS | NATURAL CASING BEEF & PORK FRANKFURTERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 232 cal | 304 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FRANKS | NATURAL CASING BEEF & PORK FRANKFURTERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FRANKS | NATURAL CASING BEEF & PORK FRANKFURTERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 480 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,161 MG | 804 MG |