CHICKEN FRANKS vs UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FRANKS: 5
vs
UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FRANKS | UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 288 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fat | 19.6 g | 26.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FRANKS | UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FRANKS | UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 821 MG | 362 MG |