CHICKEN FRANKS vs CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FRANKS: 5
vs
CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FRANKS | CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 524 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 9.5 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 45.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FRANKS | CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FRANKS | CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 179 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 857 MG | 1,452 MG |