CHICKEN FRANKS vs NATURAL CASING HOT DOGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FRANKS: 4
vs
NATURAL CASING HOT DOGS: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FRANKS | NATURAL CASING HOT DOGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 214 cal | 303 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 14.1 g | |
| Carbs | 8.9 g | 2.0 g | |
| Fat | 14.3 g | 26.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FRANKS | NATURAL CASING HOT DOGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FRANKS | NATURAL CASING HOT DOGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,107 MG | 899 MG |