CHICKEN FRANKS vs NATURAL CASING SNAPPY GRILLERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FRANKS: 5
vs
NATURAL CASING SNAPPY GRILLERS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FRANKS | NATURAL CASING SNAPPY GRILLERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 233 cal | 288 cal | |
| Protein | 11.6 g | 12.1 g | |
| Carbs | 2.3 g | 1.5 g | |
| Fat | 18.6 g | 25.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FRANKS | NATURAL CASING SNAPPY GRILLERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FRANKS | NATURAL CASING SNAPPY GRILLERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 93 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,163 MG | 848 MG |