CHICKEN FRANKS vs REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FRANKS: 3
vs
REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FRANKS | REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 214 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 14.6 g | |
| Carbs | 8.9 g | 8.3 g | |
| Fat | 14.3 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FRANKS | REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 18.8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FRANKS | REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,107 MG | 979 MG |