CHICKEN CAESAR WRAP vs BONELESS & SKINLESS COOKED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN CAESAR WRAP wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN CAESAR WRAP: 5
vs
BONELESS & SKINLESS COOKED HAM: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN CAESAR WRAP | BONELESS & SKINLESS COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 263 cal | 179 cal | |
| Protein | 11.6 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 28.8 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 11.1 g | 12.5 g | |
| Fiber | 2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN CAESAR WRAP | BONELESS & SKINLESS COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 9.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN CAESAR WRAP | BONELESS & SKINLESS COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 51 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 323 MG | 1,107 MG |