CHICKEN BUN LENGTH FRANKS vs BEEF SUMMER SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN BUN LENGTH FRANKS: 3
vs
BEEF SUMMER SAUSAGE: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN BUN LENGTH FRANKS | BEEF SUMMER SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 232 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 26.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN BUN LENGTH FRANKS | BEEF SUMMER SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN BUN LENGTH FRANKS | BEEF SUMMER SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 107 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.3 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,071 MG | 1,143 MG |