CHICKEN BUN LENGTH FRANKS vs BEEF FRANKS SKINLESS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN BUN LENGTH FRANKS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN BUN LENGTH FRANKS: 6
vs
BEEF FRANKS SKINLESS: 1
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN BUN LENGTH FRANKS | BEEF FRANKS SKINLESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 232 cal | 265 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 12.2 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 2.0 g | |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 24.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN BUN LENGTH FRANKS | BEEF FRANKS SKINLESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN BUN LENGTH FRANKS | BEEF FRANKS SKINLESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 107 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,071 MG | 878 MG |