CHICKEN BOLOGNA vs HAM CAPOCOLLA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HAM CAPOCOLLA wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN BOLOGNA: 3
vs
HAM CAPOCOLLA: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN BOLOGNA | HAM CAPOCOLLA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 214 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 14.3 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN BOLOGNA | HAM CAPOCOLLA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN BOLOGNA | HAM CAPOCOLLA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 143 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 500 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,250 MG | 1,036 MG |