CHICKEN BOLOGNA vs COOKED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED HAM wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN BOLOGNA: 0
vs
COOKED HAM: 6
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN BOLOGNA | COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 235 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 8.8 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 8.8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 14.7 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN BOLOGNA | COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN BOLOGNA | COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,235 MG | 1,321 MG |