CHERRY SPARKLING RUSH vs COCONUT PLANT-BASED ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COCONUT PLANT-BASED ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHERRY SPARKLING RUSH: 2
vs
COCONUT PLANT-BASED ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHERRY SPARKLING RUSH | COCONUT PLANT-BASED ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 265 cal | 10 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 76.5 g | 2.4 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHERRY SPARKLING RUSH | COCONUT PLANT-BASED ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 3.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHERRY SPARKLING RUSH | COCONUT PLANT-BASED ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Potassium, K | 4,176 MG | 152 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 3,824 MG | 73 MG | |
| Zinc, Zn | 0 MG | 0.8 MG |