CHEDDAR SUMMER SAUSAGE vs UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
CHEDDAR SUMMER SAUSAGE: 3
vs
UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHEDDAR SUMMER SAUSAGE | UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 357 cal | 288 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fat | 30.4 g | 26.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHEDDAR SUMMER SAUSAGE | UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHEDDAR SUMMER SAUSAGE | UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,286 MG | 362 MG |