CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING vs RUSTIC ITALIAN DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RUSTIC ITALIAN DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING: 1
vs
RUSTIC ITALIAN DRESSING: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING | RUSTIC ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 233 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 10 g | |
| Fat | 43.3 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING | RUSTIC ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING | RUSTIC ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 800 MG | 1,100 MG |