CHAMPAGNE DRESSING vs LITEHOUSE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LITEHOUSE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHAMPAGNE DRESSING: 1
vs
LITEHOUSE: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHAMPAGNE DRESSING | LITEHOUSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 465 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 4.7 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 48.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHAMPAGNE DRESSING | LITEHOUSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHAMPAGNE DRESSING | LITEHOUSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,367 MG | 581 MG |