CHALK TIN HARD CANDY vs BLUE RASPBERRY RINGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BLUE RASPBERRY RINGS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHALK TIN HARD CANDY: 0
vs
BLUE RASPBERRY RINGS: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHALK TIN HARD CANDY | BLUE RASPBERRY RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 387 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 5 g | |
| Carbs | 93.3 g | 72.5 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHALK TIN HARD CANDY | BLUE RASPBERRY RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHALK TIN HARD CANDY | BLUE RASPBERRY RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 7 MG | 25 MG |