CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON vs COOKED-TAIL OFF SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED-TAIL OFF SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON: 4
vs
COOKED-TAIL OFF SHRIMP: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON | COOKED-TAIL OFF SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 221 cal | 59 cal | |
| Protein | 15.9 g | 14.1 g | |
| Carbs | 13.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 10.6 g | 0.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON | COOKED-TAIL OFF SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 3.2 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON | COOKED-TAIL OFF SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 41 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 42 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 850 MG | 765 MG |