CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON vs WILD ALASKA POLLOCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON: 5
vs
WILD ALASKA POLLOCK: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON | WILD ALASKA POLLOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 204 cal | 59 cal | |
| Protein | 18.6 g | 11.8 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 13.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON | WILD ALASKA POLLOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON | WILD ALASKA POLLOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 15 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 160 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 389 MG | 329 MG |