CANDY HOLDER vs ALMOND BARK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALMOND BARK wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
CANDY HOLDER: 3
vs
ALMOND BARK: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CANDY HOLDER | ALMOND BARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 511 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.1 g | |
| Carbs | 93.3 g | 70.2 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 27.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CANDY HOLDER | ALMOND BARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CANDY HOLDER | ALMOND BARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 67 MG | 11 MG |