CANDY CANE SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS vs VALENTINE HOLLAND MINTS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CANDY CANE SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CANDY CANE SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS: 4
vs
VALENTINE HOLLAND MINTS: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CANDY CANE SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS | VALENTINE HOLLAND MINTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 80 g | 80 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 10 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CANDY CANE SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS | VALENTINE HOLLAND MINTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CANDY CANE SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS | VALENTINE HOLLAND MINTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 50 MG | 0 MG |