CANDIED BACON RUB vs GROUND SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GROUND SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CANDIED BACON RUB: 2
vs
GROUND SHRIMP: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CANDIED BACON RUB | GROUND SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 1,500 cal | 314 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 67.9 g | |
| Carbs | 200 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 200 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CANDIED BACON RUB | GROUND SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CANDIED BACON RUB | GROUND SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 536 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 9.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 1,796 MG |