CALIFORNIA ALMONDS vs EMERALD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EMERALD wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CALIFORNIA ALMONDS: 4
vs
EMERALD: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 536 cal | 565 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 21.4 g | 23.5 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 47.1 g | |
| Fiber | 10.7 g | 11.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 250 MG | 235 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.2 MG | 3.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 536 MG | 635 MG |