CAESAR PLANT BASED DRESSING vs CHAMPAGNE DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAESAR PLANT BASED DRESSING wins in 3 out of 7 nutrient categories
CAESAR PLANT BASED DRESSING: 3
vs
CHAMPAGNE DRESSING: 1
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CAESAR PLANT BASED DRESSING | CHAMPAGNE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 40 g | 64.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CAESAR PLANT BASED DRESSING | CHAMPAGNE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium, Na | 333 MG | 607 MG |