CAESAR PLANT BASED DRESSING vs SWEET CHILI DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET CHILI DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
CAESAR PLANT BASED DRESSING: 2
vs
SWEET CHILI DRESSING: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CAESAR PLANT BASED DRESSING | SWEET CHILI DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fat | 40 g | 36.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CAESAR PLANT BASED DRESSING | SWEET CHILI DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 12 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CAESAR PLANT BASED DRESSING | SWEET CHILI DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 283 MG | 933 MG |