CAESAR DRESSING vs BLUE CHEESE ORGANIC DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAESAR DRESSING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
CAESAR DRESSING: 3
vs
BLUE CHEESE ORGANIC DRESSING: 1
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CAESAR DRESSING | BLUE CHEESE ORGANIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 367 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.3 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 3.3 g | Tie |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CAESAR DRESSING | BLUE CHEESE ORGANIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CAESAR DRESSING | BLUE CHEESE ORGANIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 67 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 50 MG | 67 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 933 MG | 667 MG |