CAESAR DRESSING vs CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING wins in 3 out of 9 nutrient categories
CAESAR DRESSING: 2
vs
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CAESAR DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 567 cal | 552 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 60 g | 58.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CAESAR DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 867 MG | 724 MG |