CAESAR DRESSING vs CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAESAR DRESSING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CAESAR DRESSING: 5
vs
CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING: 0
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CAESAR DRESSING | CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 567 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.3 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 3.3 g | Tie |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 60 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CAESAR DRESSING | CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CAESAR DRESSING | CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 50 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 933 MG | 867 MG |