CAESAR DRESSING vs CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING & DIP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAESAR DRESSING wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
CAESAR DRESSING: 7
vs
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING & DIP: 0
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CAESAR DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING & DIP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 433 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 43.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CAESAR DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING & DIP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CAESAR DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING & DIP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 50 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 933 MG | 833 MG |