CAESAR DRESSING vs MCCORMICK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 8 nutrient categories
CAESAR DRESSING: 3
vs
MCCORMICK: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CAESAR DRESSING | MCCORMICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 417 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 16.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 50 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CAESAR DRESSING | MCCORMICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 20 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CAESAR DRESSING | MCCORMICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 1,250 MG |