BUTTERSCOTCH PUDDING SNACKS vs NATILLA SUGAR CANE CUSTARD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BUTTERSCOTCH PUDDING SNACKS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BUTTERSCOTCH PUDDING SNACKS: 5
vs
NATILLA SUGAR CANE CUSTARD: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUTTERSCOTCH PUDDING SNACKS | NATILLA SUGAR CANE CUSTARD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 98 cal | 124 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.9 g | |
| Carbs | 18.5 g | 22.9 g | |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 2.1 g | |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUTTERSCOTCH PUDDING SNACKS | NATILLA SUGAR CANE CUSTARD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 102 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Phosphorus, P | 0 MG | 81 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 147 MG | 0 MG |