BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING vs NATURAL DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NATURAL DRESSING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING: 2
vs
NATURAL DRESSING: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING | NATURAL DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 586 cal | 464 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 65.5 g | 46.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING | NATURAL DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING | NATURAL DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 862 MG | 571 MG |