BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING vs SUPREME CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING: 4
vs
SUPREME CAESAR DRESSING: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING | SUPREME CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 517 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 40 g | 55.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING | SUPREME CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING | SUPREME CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 967 MG | 897 MG |