BUNFULL BEEF FRANKS vs RED HOT LINKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RED HOT LINKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BUNFULL BEEF FRANKS: 2
vs
RED HOT LINKS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUNFULL BEEF FRANKS | RED HOT LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 300 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 12 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 4 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 26 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUNFULL BEEF FRANKS | RED HOT LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUNFULL BEEF FRANKS | RED HOT LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,200 MG | 1,607 MG |