BUN SIZE BEEF FRANKS vs CLASSIC PLANT-BASED LINKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC PLANT-BASED LINKS wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
BUN SIZE BEEF FRANKS: 2
vs
CLASSIC PLANT-BASED LINKS: 7
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUN SIZE BEEF FRANKS | CLASSIC PLANT-BASED LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 302 cal | 283 cal | |
| Protein | 11.3 g | 17.4 g | |
| Carbs | 5.7 g | 6.5 g | |
| Fat | 26.4 g | 19.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 4.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUN SIZE BEEF FRANKS | CLASSIC PLANT-BASED LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUN SIZE BEEF FRANKS | CLASSIC PLANT-BASED LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 109 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 3.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 478 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,094 MG | 522 MG |