BUN LENGTH HOT DOGS FRANKS vs CHICKEN FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
BUN LENGTH HOT DOGS FRANKS: 1
vs
CHICKEN FRANKS: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUN LENGTH HOT DOGS FRANKS | CHICKEN FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 339 cal | 262 cal | |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 11.9 g | |
| Carbs | 8.9 g | 2.4 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUN LENGTH HOT DOGS FRANKS | CHICKEN FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUN LENGTH HOT DOGS FRANKS | CHICKEN FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 190 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,214 MG | 857 MG |