BUN LENGTH FRANKS vs CHICKEN FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
BUN LENGTH FRANKS: 0
vs
CHICKEN FRANKS: 6
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUN LENGTH FRANKS | CHICKEN FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 238 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 11.9 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 7.1 g | Tie |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUN LENGTH FRANKS | CHICKEN FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUN LENGTH FRANKS | CHICKEN FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 107 MG | 143 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,036 MG | 1,071 MG |