BUN LENGTH FRANKS vs OLD WISCONSIN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OLD WISCONSIN wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
BUN LENGTH FRANKS: 3
vs
OLD WISCONSIN: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUN LENGTH FRANKS | OLD WISCONSIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 36.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUN LENGTH FRANKS | OLD WISCONSIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUN LENGTH FRANKS | OLD WISCONSIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 107 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 929 MG | 1,533 MG |