BUN LENGTH FRANKS vs 100% GRASS-FED BEEF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
100% GRASS-FED BEEF wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
BUN LENGTH FRANKS: 2
vs
100% GRASS-FED BEEF: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUN LENGTH FRANKS | 100% GRASS-FED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 244 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 13.3 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 20 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUN LENGTH FRANKS | 100% GRASS-FED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 26.7 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUN LENGTH FRANKS | 100% GRASS-FED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 107 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,036 MG | 711 MG |