BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS vs POLISH KIELBASA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
POLISH KIELBASA wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS: 1
vs
POLISH KIELBASA: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | POLISH KIELBASA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 298 cal | 263 cal | |
| Protein | 10.5 g | 15.8 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 3.5 g | Tie |
| Fat | 26.3 g | 21.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | POLISH KIELBASA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | POLISH KIELBASA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 912 MG | 754 MG |